The complaint made by IU Verdes Equo regarding the situation of the Blue Zone parking system in Motril reflects a concern over the lack of transparency and effectiveness in the management of this service.

The assertion that it “costs the Town Hall money” instead of being a source of income is alarming, especially considering that in other towns, this type of ‘parking robbery’ tends to be profitable.

They have also requested an audit to evaluate the concession and the revenue accounts is pertinent, as they believe this could shed light on the truthfulness of the company’s claims. A thorough analysis could reveal whether there is indeed a deficit or if resources are being mismanaged.

Furthermore, the idea that citizens are being charged double is a criticism that could resonate among voters (it’s always about the voters), generating understandable discontent towards the local administration.

The IU Verdes Equo asserts that it is essential to ensure that the service truly meets its objectives and does not represent an additional cost for the Town Hall. Implementing corrective measures is crucial, not only to restore the public’s trust in its administration but also to ensure that public funds are used efficiently and effectively for the benefit of the community.

An obviously politically motivated attack, but it would be interesting to see the results of such an audit. What do you think?

(News: Motril Costa Tropical, Granada, Andalucia)

Keywords: Blue Zones, IU-Equo, Town Hall